October 2, 2026
As pastors think about communicating theological concepts and principles, they may find surprising common ground with those outside the church on some issues but also troubling disagreements within their own pews.
The 2022 biennial State of Theology conducted by Lifeway Research for Ligonier Ministries shows there are areas where even those with evangelical beliefs struggle with various truths of Christian theology. Based on their responses to the four statements which define evangelical beliefs, Americans can be divided into five categories: those with no evangelical beliefs (16%), low evangelical beliefs (10%), moderate evangelical beliefs (21%), high evangelical beliefs (33%), and complete evangelical beliefs (21%).
Those with complete evangelical beliefs strongly agree with all four of the following statements:
Using these categories along with statistical analysis of the 31 statements in the State of Theology survey, a pattern appears showing where Americans have commonalities or differences across Christian theological beliefs.
The State of Theology questions can be divided into three distinct factors. Looking at the responses to the questions within each factor across the five levels of evangelical beliefs provides insight into where Americans find agreement across theological beliefs and where conflicts may emerge.
Fifteen questions in the State of Theology survey specifically evaluate people’s beliefs about the truthfulness of theological statements. The percentage of people agreeing with the statement generally increases with evangelical beliefs.
Many of these questions describe attributes of God and His position on sin. People with varying degrees of evangelical beliefs are likely to find common ground on these questions. On the other hand, people who already reject many of the biblical principles communicated by Christians disagree with these statements.
The statement Americans with complete evangelical beliefs are least likely to agree with is “God chose the people he would save before He created the world.” This statement is understandably difficult to digest and has great potential for misunderstanding and misapplication.
There is only one statement where those with complete evangelical beliefs are not the most likely to agree. Those with high evangelical beliefs are more likely than those with complete evangelical beliefs to agree “the Holy Spirit gives a spiritual new birth or new life before a person has faith in Jesus Christ.” Again, this touches on contested issues within Christianity.
People with no evangelical beliefs are resolute in their positions against all 15 of these statements. The statement more Americans without evangelical beliefs agree with (16%) is, “God created male and female.” This is an interesting result considering the many current controversies regarding gender in American society.
Americans without evangelical beliefs disagree most with the following two statements: “The Bible is 100% accurate in all that it teaches,” and, “There will be a time when Jesus Christ returns to judge all the people who have lived.” The latter statement has zero support from those with no evangelical beliefs. Since this statement has the most potential for personal accountability, it is logical those who fully reject evangelical beliefs also fully reject this statement.
Ten questions in the State of Theology survey evaluate religious distinctives. These ten statements have less separation among those with different levels of evangelical beliefs.
For example, those with complete evangelical beliefs are the most likely to disagree (76%) with the statement “God is unconcerned with my day-to-day decisions.” They are also the most likely to disagree (41%) that “worshiping alone or with one’s family is a valid replacement for regularly attending church.” This shows there is less universal acceptance among people with evangelical beliefs in these statements as compared to the statements in the previous section.
There are statements with unusual interactions among the levels of evangelical beliefs, where it doesn’t follow the trend of increased agreement with increased acceptance of the four evangelical distinctives. For example, similar percentages of those with no (43%), low (45%), and high (49%) evangelical beliefs disagree with the statement that “gender identity is a matter of choice.”
For the statement, “The Holy Spirit can tell me to do something which is forbidden in the Bible,” there are no significant differences across the levels of evangelical beliefs. And there is no direct correlation between the level of disagreement and the level of evangelical beliefs. This indicates respondents may hold different interpretations of this statement. Some may disagree because they do not believe the Holy Spirit exists and could tell them anything. Some may disagree because they do not believe the Bible forbids anything. And some may disagree because they accept the authority of the Bible.
Finally, these six questions consider people’s beliefs about some nuances of who God is and who He says people are. This last factor is where the lines across levels of evangelical beliefs are most blurred. These statements are highly contentious and touch on sensitive subjects. Most of the statements saw similar response levels among those with no or complete evangelical beliefs.
The statement “Jesus is the first and greatest being created by God” flipped the script from other statements. Those with no evangelical beliefs disagree more than any other group (77%). Those with no evangelical beliefs may disagree with this statement for multiple reasons, none of which align with the biblical reason for rejecting it. They may disagree with the concept of creation in general. They may find fault with Jesus being called the greatest being. Finally, they may not agree that Jesus, if created, was first. Conversely, only 21% of those with complete evangelical beliefs disagreed with this statement.
Pastors and church leaders should not make assumptions about what shared theological beliefs they have with both those in their community and in their congregation. There may be some areas of unaware agreement with those outside the church and places for renewed focus and correction within the congregation.
Share with others
